AR "intentional force"

The home for threads that have been locked and don't fit into any other archive category.

Moderator: Moderators

Ark7
Data [Conditional]
Posts: 17
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 12:34 am

AR "intentional force"

Unread post by Ark7 »

As AR posted earlier in the Bungie forums, many of the members thought of using force back at AR, Ar replied that he would not recommend us doing that etc.

My Question / Idea is

If we do use force on him, what the hell could he do to us or will do to us/himself? We should try it once hes back at 1 am, Threaten him that the "Sleeping Princess" will be terminated or something.
Injunfett
Data [Authenticated]
Posts: 57
Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2007 9:57 pm

Re: AR "intentional force"

Unread post by Injunfett »

If he comes back and people post dumb questions, and make him mad most likely he will just leave, and give us no info on this contact.

The first 2 contacts over at bunige have given us nothing at all to go off of, so if he is on the forms were screwed.
User avatar
Sir Topham Hat
Moderator [Designated]
Posts: 537
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 12:51 am
Location: Pennsylvania
Contact:

Re: AR "intentional force"

Unread post by Sir Topham Hat »

He doesn't believe the things we say. He won't believe you.
User avatar
Avateur
Moderator [Designated]
Posts: 770
Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2007 11:16 pm

Re: AR "intentional force"

Unread post by Avateur »

Treat it with respect. Say please. Don't just issue direct commands. See what it will give us. Humility can get you places.
DoItForTheLuulz
Data [Conditional]
Posts: 14
Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2007 10:49 pm

Re: AR "intentional force"

Unread post by DoItForTheLuulz »

What about a goodcop/badcop kind of thing?

Have some people try a nicer approach, and others threaten him constantly?
strifemaster
Data [Undefined]
Posts: 2
Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2007 11:41 pm

Re: AR "intentional force"

Unread post by strifemaster »

I say better safe than sorry.
endejas
Data [Authenticated]
Posts: 138
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 1:05 am

Re: AR "intentional force"

Unread post by endejas »

Even if we wanted to force AR into using "instructional force", there isn't a way we know how to threaten it. The ball's in his court right now.
User avatar
Sir Topham Hat
Moderator [Designated]
Posts: 537
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 12:51 am
Location: Pennsylvania
Contact:

Re: AR "intentional force"

Unread post by Sir Topham Hat »

I agree with endejas, the fact is we just don't know enough about what is going on to do anything but ask politely. He did say that using force against him was "Inadvisable". Last time he went away, probably faster, because he said something like the "noise to signal ratio is not optimal", there were too many posts and too many questions to respond to.
Lanik
Data [Conditional]
Posts: 30
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 2:11 am
Location: Here.

Re: AR "intentional force"

Unread post by Lanik »

He's already been threatened by one of the forum ninjas, to apparently no avail. What could we do that a ninja couldn't?
User avatar
Sir Topham Hat
Moderator [Designated]
Posts: 537
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 12:51 am
Location: Pennsylvania
Contact:

Re: AR "intentional force"

Unread post by Sir Topham Hat »

He didn't respond to the ninja cause I'm pretty sure he has more authority in the system than the ninja does. Plus, I don't think he likes responding to threats.
Locked