AR "intentional force"
Moderator: Moderators
AR "intentional force"
As AR posted earlier in the Bungie forums, many of the members thought of using force back at AR, Ar replied that he would not recommend us doing that etc.
My Question / Idea is
If we do use force on him, what the hell could he do to us or will do to us/himself? We should try it once hes back at 1 am, Threaten him that the "Sleeping Princess" will be terminated or something.
My Question / Idea is
If we do use force on him, what the hell could he do to us or will do to us/himself? We should try it once hes back at 1 am, Threaten him that the "Sleeping Princess" will be terminated or something.
Re: AR "intentional force"
If he comes back and people post dumb questions, and make him mad most likely he will just leave, and give us no info on this contact.
The first 2 contacts over at bunige have given us nothing at all to go off of, so if he is on the forms were screwed.
The first 2 contacts over at bunige have given us nothing at all to go off of, so if he is on the forms were screwed.
- Sir Topham Hat
- Moderator [Designated]
- Posts: 537
- Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 12:51 am
- Location: Pennsylvania
- Contact:
Re: AR "intentional force"
He doesn't believe the things we say. He won't believe you.
Re: AR "intentional force"
Treat it with respect. Say please. Don't just issue direct commands. See what it will give us. Humility can get you places.
-
- Data [Conditional]
- Posts: 14
- Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2007 10:49 pm
Re: AR "intentional force"
What about a goodcop/badcop kind of thing?
Have some people try a nicer approach, and others threaten him constantly?
Have some people try a nicer approach, and others threaten him constantly?
-
- Data [Undefined]
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2007 11:41 pm
Re: AR "intentional force"
I say better safe than sorry.
Re: AR "intentional force"
Even if we wanted to force AR into using "instructional force", there isn't a way we know how to threaten it. The ball's in his court right now.
- Sir Topham Hat
- Moderator [Designated]
- Posts: 537
- Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 12:51 am
- Location: Pennsylvania
- Contact:
Re: AR "intentional force"
I agree with endejas, the fact is we just don't know enough about what is going on to do anything but ask politely. He did say that using force against him was "Inadvisable". Last time he went away, probably faster, because he said something like the "noise to signal ratio is not optimal", there were too many posts and too many questions to respond to.
Re: AR "intentional force"
He's already been threatened by one of the forum ninjas, to apparently no avail. What could we do that a ninja couldn't?
- Sir Topham Hat
- Moderator [Designated]
- Posts: 537
- Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 12:51 am
- Location: Pennsylvania
- Contact:
Re: AR "intentional force"
He didn't respond to the ninja cause I'm pretty sure he has more authority in the system than the ninja does. Plus, I don't think he likes responding to threats.