Next Clue in Infestation Measurements?
Moderator: Moderators
-
- Data [Authenticated]
- Posts: 141
- Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2007 5:16 am
- Contact:
Next Clue in Infestation Measurements?
well looking at the Infestation image i couldn't help but see several errors, or intentional marks, in the image
take the outline for instance, its uncentered, and doesn't seem to have much purpose, and sizes are uneven aswell
you may also notice that the 3rd box is 1 px taller than the other 2, and the center one is "7" pixels smaller than the other 2. also the graph squares aren't square either, but are 26x29
also unseen to the naked eye is a small gradient at the top, probably nothing, but still there:
so what could this mean?, do these numbers have any significance to the ARG (IP's, Coord's, Password's, etc.) i think the numbers of the most importance are 133, and 177, any ideas?
take the outline for instance, its uncentered, and doesn't seem to have much purpose, and sizes are uneven aswell
you may also notice that the 3rd box is 1 px taller than the other 2, and the center one is "7" pixels smaller than the other 2. also the graph squares aren't square either, but are 26x29
also unseen to the naked eye is a small gradient at the top, probably nothing, but still there:
so what could this mean?, do these numbers have any significance to the ARG (IP's, Coord's, Password's, etc.) i think the numbers of the most importance are 133, and 177, any ideas?
-
- Facilitator [Conditional]
- Posts: 386
- Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 8:29 pm
- Location: Portland F'ing Oregon
Re: Next Clue in Infestation Measurements?
I was photochopping this pic for a while as well, but messing with overlaying them with different opacities... the red boxes don't overlay evenly on all 3, you can see more of the big blue orb on the 3rd slide than the same orb in the first 2 slides. Nothing stood out as being significant, though.
Edit: EliteSniper177? 177 pixels? You were mean to find this! The new Chosen One!
Edit: EliteSniper177? 177 pixels? You were mean to find this! The new Chosen One!
-
- Data [Authenticated]
- Posts: 141
- Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2007 5:16 am
- Contact:
Re: Next Clue in Infestation Measurements?
lol, i noticed that to
anyway i think the numbers that might be the best to try could be the different height and width values, 140, 133, 176, and 177, but again could be nothing
anyway i think the numbers that might be the best to try could be the different height and width values, 140, 133, 176, and 177, but again could be nothing
-
- Data [Conditional]
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2007 11:41 pm
Re: Next Clue in Infestation Measurements?
I tried both 133 and 177 under the IPs and have found nothing
-
- Data [Authenticated]
- Posts: 290
- Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2007 2:57 pm
- Location: Jersey
- Contact:
Re: Next Clue in Infestation Measurements?
When I looked at the pic, I was reminded that the gas giant the first Halo station (Halo 1) orbited, had a red/copper colored moon. Perhaps the square is actually the building location for the first Halo station seen *through* the gas giant?
Re: Next Clue in Infestation Measurements?
Also, the red rectangles are different widths as well the left one is 75x119, the middle is 89x119, and the right one is 81x119.
Could this all be an accident?
Could this all be an accident?
-
- Data [Authenticated]
- Posts: 106
- Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2007 11:09 pm
Re: Next Clue in Infestation Measurements?
All the numbers are in ip range too.
Re: Next Clue in Infestation Measurements?
There's a lot of numbers to choose from, though...System Failure wrote:All the numbers are in ip range too.
But we also have very few leads, so who knows...
-
- Data [Authenticated]
- Posts: 61
- Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2007 6:55 am
- Location: Swimming around the interwebz
Re: Next Clue in Infestation Measurements?
I think we're reaching a little too far in this thread...
-
- Data [Conditional]
- Posts: 26
- Joined: Fri Jul 20, 2007 1:46 am