
Re: Weekly Update Message Discussion [BWU - 6/6/08]
Ok, (hey all, I'm still around

)
I've created a wiki page for these log entries (for now keeping 'caretaker' posts unrelated) at
http://halo.wikibruce.com/The_SmugglerI've just added timestamp calculations, all based on 365.2422. I find it interesting that all calculated periods are no more precise then hundredths of a second (ie it seems they may have indeed used 365.2422 days/year, with initial values no more precise than 100th/sec - that we're on track in calculating).
Anyway, we can't precisely match up the REPORTS to the LOGS yet because there's no indication of the perdio of time between the first LOG and any stamped REPORT. A general
order perhaps, but nothing more. I do agree that these two sets of entries occurred effectively simultaneously though.
The 5h 41m 8s (precisely) short of 100,000 years result I came to is very, very curious. What's the significance of
precisely 100,000 years - a countdown somewhere? a 'prophecy' fulfilled? I always considered "100,000 years" to be a rough approximate, since the the two separated events were essentially entirely unconnected. Or was there someone/thing that waited precisely 100,000 years before
purposely releasing the Flood?
I also find the +/- 7yrs, 12m, 39.44s margin of error ...interesting.